The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below illustrate the value mass and origins of imported fish in the United States from 1988 to 2000.

It is really clear that the value of imported fish rose gradually, and the fish sources proved some significant changes through the years.

In the year of 1988, total value of imported fish was 6.57 billion dollars. This year also saw the domination of Canada's fish, which took more than half of the proportion. At 1992, the value increased nearly a third, with almost 2 more billions added to it. Canada at this year set a huge drawback, with only 34% remained. On the other hand, China saw a slight growth in proportion. Other sources from around the globe took up almost 50% of the margin. To the year of 2000, again, total market mass rose up to 10.7 billion dollars. At this period of time, Canada got their proportion shrunk to just 30%. That is only one-third from the rate at 1988. China skyrocketed all the way to 30%, while the remaining source oscillated a little bit, with only 4% of its own margin vanished.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-27 Szprawstyle 78 view
2017-12-15 milanree1527@yahoo.com 81 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user Szprawstyle :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ose up to 10.7 billion dollars. At this period of time, Canada got their proportion shrunk to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 729, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...while the remaining source oscillated a little bit, with only 4% of its own margin vanishe...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, so, third, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59139784946 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26718587838 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.276363394 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.1666666667 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155584641287 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611199417404 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680889972219 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141278768216 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428486009716 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.