The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, california and the rest of the worldwide.
The given pie charts clearly representated the usage of water in percentum by the San Diego country and california and the worldwide.
As we can seen that, utilisation of water mainly categorised into three parts. Firstly, San Diego country maximum water consumed by the residents is 60% and 17% water used in industry while as 23% using of water in agriculture. After that, it have been notice that, 39% water used by the residents, where as in industry and agriculture usage of water is 28% and 33% respectively. Besides, in all over the world only 8% water consumption by the residents. Either industry or agriculture utilisation of water with the ratio of 23:69 percent in the worldwide.
Overall, it is evident that only in california utilisation of water approximately at the same average.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-09-04 | Prince gill | 56 | view |
- Some people believe they should keep all the money, they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes. should these new homes be constructed in existing cities or should new towns be build in countryside? 84
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the art and this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view. 89
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, california and the rest of the worldwide. 56
- The diagram below shows the process for making a water clock. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...ifornia and the worldwide. As we can seen that, utilisation of water mainly categ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...of water in agriculture. After that, it have been notice that, 39% water used by the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... that, 39% water used by the residents, where as in industry and agriculture usage of wa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 669.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 133.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03007518797 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.39596269041 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96074530757 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563909774436 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4659956214 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5714285714 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328785969995 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158490356095 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14780399318 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269350241196 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171849110564 0.0819641961636 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.