The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010
The proportion of the median Japanese and Malaysian family’s expenses to various divisions in 2010 are collated in the pie charts.
Overall, shelter, food and different commodities and service drained a lion share of a Malaysian’s earning while Japanese people spent more on products and service. On the contrary, Healthcare obtained by far the lowest percentage of expenditure in both countries.
Looking at the information in more detail, the greatest proportion of paying out (34%) was on Housing in Malaysia meanwhile in Japan Housing accounted for just 21% of the total. Likewise, in Japan, the biggest single outlay was other goods and services at 29%, compared with 26% in Malaysia. Furthermore, Food came in second place in both countries, food expenditure In Malaysia (27%) was slightly higher than that of Japan (24%). Besides, money spent for transportation fall as the fourth priority with an average of 20% in Japan and 10% in Malaysia. Eventually, Japanese people are more attentive Healthcare than Malaysian, just only 3% paid by Malaysian whereas 6% paid by Japanese.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-16 | Chinkiarora | view | |
| 2021-07-02 | Chinkiarora | 100 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Chinkiarora | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Chinkiarora | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Chinkiarora | view |
- Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status, 1998-99 96
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses.Why? Who benefit from this, the community or these young people? 84
- Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them be 84
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010 78
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, likewise, look, second, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31213872832 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01890199475 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630057803468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.4067101429 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156073696645 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656219043354 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044055809971 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882678808459 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489334124199 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.