The pie charts below illustrate aspects of trade between Vietnam and the United States in 1994.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts show the exports from Vietnam to America and from America to Vietnam in 1994. During this year, the US exported much more to Vietnam than Vietnam exported to the US. Vietnamese exports tended to be primary products, while American exports were dominated by manufactured goods.
The first pie chart shows that Vietnamese exports totalled $52 million. The majority of Vietnamese exports were the products of primary industry (agriculture and fishing), with coffee ($23 million) and vegetables and fruit ($16 million) being the main exports. Rice and seafood were also important exports contributing $4.3 and $4.4 million respectively. The least important were garments and other at $2 million each.
In the second pie chart it can be seen that more than half of the American exports were industrial products. The largest category of US exports was aircraft parts, which were worth $20 million more than the total value of Vietnamese exports. This was followed by other products ($35 million) and machinery ($30.5 million). Fertiliser, cotton and cars made up the remaining $34.5 million.
Overall, Vietnam exported products worth $52m to the US, while the US exported products worth more than three times this to Vietnam ($172m).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-31 | subashtimalsina112 | 11 | view |
- The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 61
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 73
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 78
- The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25 44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas Summarise the information 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast important were garments and other at million each. In the second pie chart...
^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...t important were garments and other at million each. In the second pie chart it can...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17857142857 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58754968444 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4614205716 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5833333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0682461100797 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332770543214 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404936074951 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0488914391461 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220787267247 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.