The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students, PhD students, and junior lecturers at an Australian university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare three categories of people such as all students, PhD students, and junior lecturers of Australian university, who read definite number of articles per week.
Overall, the largest proportion of readers are PhD students and junior lecturers as compared with all students.
PhD students read at least twelve articles per week in comparison with the average student during the week. So, it consists 80 per cent and twelve percent of people. And only five percent of those studying doctorates reads less 5 items, at that time for students it is 67 percent. So, the third fraction equals 15 percent reads between 6 and 11 units for PhD researchers and 21 percentage of all students.
Meanwhile, for junior lecturers the pie chart has a different pattern. Notwithstanding the only one percent of junior lecturers read from 1 to 5 articles of academic journals the greatest percent of readers have more than 6 and less than 11 articles, what has seventy-five percent lecturers. And twenty-four proportion read twelve or more, which is a third of the corresponding number of PhD readers.
- Some people believe that handwriting is no longer useful in the modern world and should not be taught in schools To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010 41
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate online without any face to face contact with other people Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The diagram below show how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- Scientific researches should be the responsibility of governments rather than commercial organizations Do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, while, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08791208791 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86388152921 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565934065934 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5918864337 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347353717804 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153435632993 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121528488356 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247869177921 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121848760331 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.