The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students, PhD students, and junior lecturers at an Australian university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts provide information about the number of journal articles read by all students, Ph.D. students, and junior lecturers per week at an Australian university. The data is in the percentage.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given pie chart that there was a higher number of Junior lectures and Ph.D. students read 6 to 12+ articles per week.
As per the charts,67 percent of all students read only five articles or less than five per week, which was higher than 5% of Ph.D. students and 1% of junior lecturers. When it comes to reading 12 and more than 12 journal articles per day, a Ph.D. student was at the top position with 80%. Move to the second-highest, 24% of Junior lecturer read more than 12 articles per day, which was nearly double that of all students.
Furthermore,75 percent of junior lecturers read nearly 6 to 11 articles per week which were 60% higher than Ph.D. students and 54 percent more than all students in the university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-11 | nahid_tavasspli | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | YESWANTH KALUVA | 42 | view |
| 2021-08-04 | shinelks02@gmail.com | view | |
| 2021-07-04 | baljit12 | view | |
| 2021-07-04 | baljit12 | view |
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 78
- People can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a di erence To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph gives information about male and female gym membership between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below give information about world spending and population 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun articles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...all students read only five articles or less than five per week, which was higher th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73372781065 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61060099627 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485207100592 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3066418946 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366968702683 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201519137703 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113159053127 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277588443207 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582218757274 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.