The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts illustrate the appliances that young adults in Canada use to watch television programmes and how this has changed over the ten-year period from 2009 to 2019. One of the key changes over this decade is the transition from conventional televisions to flat-screens, with the former falling from 34% to 4% and the latter rising from 8% to 27% for the period, making it the number one television device. The latter has replaced the former as the most popular TV viewing device.
Another general trend is that younger people are now watching television on smaller, more portable devices than in 2009. In particular, the use of mobile phones and tablets for viewing purposes has increased by almost three quarters to 26% and tablet use seeing an almost four-fold increase to 19%. This trend is reinforced by the number of 18 to 25-year-olds using computers for the TV viewing. Both desktop and laptop computers saw substantial falls in usage (around a third for both).
Overall then, it can be said that the two pie charts suggest the TV viewing habits in Canada over the period saw a move away from older devices and towards more modern equivalents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-12 | jenny_nguyen | 82 | view |
| 2021-12-16 | mrinal | 79 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | Amna Zeeshan | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | Quoc Dat | 74 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | tajindersaini786 | 78 | view |
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 78
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- Many people say that companies should give importante to their employees whereas others say that they should give importance to customers Discuss both and opine 85
- Students in a school should learn academic subjects and pass exams Other skills such as cookery dressmaking and woodwork learnt well from family and friends do you agree or disagree 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... appliances that young adults in Canada use to watch television programmes and how ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, third, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87373737374 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57758402267 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9998553239 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179006235403 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759723784328 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593560574387 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114474802093 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00514119553406 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.