The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The two pie charts compare the percentage of household expenditures in two countries Japan and Malaysia in 2010. From the general perspective, the clear data could be observed that other goods and services were the highest proportion of expenditure on household in Japan, while in Malaysia, it was housing.
It is evident to see that in Japan other goods and services, food and housing made up the biggest household expenditure rate, in which other goods and services accounted at over a quarter, followed by food and housing with 24% and 21% respectively. In contrast, health care was at the bottom of 6% in 2010.
On the other hand, in Malaysia, the highest percentage of household expenses was in housing at over a third to compare with 21% in Japan. Similarly, Food's household expenditure rate in Malaysia was higher than in Japan, 27% compared with 24%. Nevertheless, the proportion of household spending in the other categories was lower than in Japan. Especially, transport and health care at 10% and 3% respectively, this figure was double in Japan, 20% and 6% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | Chayacp | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | Zulph_ | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 67
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, similarly, third, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93351746055 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505555555556 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0634406276 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274268931021 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145691275467 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106028997288 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212009565664 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103098969909 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.