The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The pie chart provided illustrates the comparison of average expenditure for households in two different countries, Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
Overall, for Japan beside health care, all other expenditure types have close percentages and transport seizes the majority, whereas, in Malaysia, Housing makes up the largest proportion if compared to others and transportation is at lower percentages in comparison with Japan.
For the first pie chart regarding Japan, Other goods and services has the highest percentage with 29%, whilst other expenditure branches Food, health care and Transport follows it with close proximity with just below a quarter (24%), 21% and 20% respectively and finally health care makes up a petty minority with 6%.
To turn to Malaysia the figure shows some differences. The highest proportion is taken by Housing with just over a third %34, food stays in the second place with slightly over a quarter (26%), other goods and services takes the third place unlike Japan’s with 27%, transportation has exactly half of than that of Japan’s with %10 and finally health care is least money spent with %3.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | Chayacp | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | Zulph_ | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy 89
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. 39
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011. 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...alth care and Transport follows it with close proximity with just below a quarter 24%, 21% and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 362, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the least'.
Suggestion: is the least
...apos;s with %10 and finally health care is least money spent with %3.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, regarding, second, so, third, whereas, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28729281768 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79631156766 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585635359116 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.710625056 43.030603864 253% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 191.4 112.824112599 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.2 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.6 5.23603664747 298% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233163240178 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172338043149 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147474593922 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189185731393 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156438441141 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.2329268293 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 61.2550243902 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.0658536585 199% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.