The pie charts compare the average household spending in Japan and Malaysia in term of five important categories in 2010.
Overall, it is clear that householders in both countries spent the largest proportion of their income on just three categories – housing, food, and other goods and services. The percentage figures for spending on transport and healthcare in Japan were double those for Malaysia.
In Malaysian households, the highest category was housing, which represented 34% of the total expenditure. This figure was higher than in Japan, with just 21% spent on housing. Japanese householders paid the highest proportion on a range of other goods and services, at 29%, which was slightly more than in Malaysia. In term of food, the figures for both nations were similar, at 24% and 27% for Malaysia and Japan respectively.
Expenditure on health care was the lowest category. In Japan, this accounted for 6% of the total, while 20% of household spending went on transport. These figures were exactly double those shown for Malaysia.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2010 69
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76354800521 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562130177515 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6691743667 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 5.23603664747 10% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227327509186 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973020041219 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110293006823 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183635264267 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136096045487 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.