The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country from 1950 and 2010
The pie charts below illustrate the average household expenditures the comparisons in a country from 1950 and 2010.
A cross the board, it Can be seen the housing was dramatic fall while the food marked at increase from the previous year.
In 1950 the housing which was the highest of that year stood at 72,1%. But, dell to a low of only 50,1% in 2010. Beside that the highest of the second admit was the food increased significant approximately to 22,8%. However, the education become declined 0,3% which was the lowest of that year. In contrast Among the other obtain growth to roughly 14,3% in 2010. similar pattern the transportation marked at increment to approximately 10,7% the food. The transportation had also increase significant likewise percentage of the health care acquire gain rought 2,1% . The conclusion from of six that proportion by major category common encounter a lot of advancement from the previous year.except, the housing undergo the highest moderate falls 22,0%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-16 | Jannatul firdausi rahma | 67 | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 61
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures on japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 61
- The line graph compares the production of energy from coal in Sweden France Denmark and Germany between 1995 and 2010 32
- The chart below shoes the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...% which was the lowest of that year. In contrast Among the other obtain growth to roughl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similar
...obtain growth to roughly 14,3% in 2010. similar pattern the transportation marked at in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...% the food. The transportation had also increase significant likewise percentage of the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the health care acquire gain rought 2,1% . The conclusion from of six that proport...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12962962963 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84074917003 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.188170162 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243032314048 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10590386243 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224346897416 0.0843802449381 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295928942016 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.338159417704 0.0819641961636 413% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.