The pie chart illustrates the comparison of the energy production in France in the following two years of 1995 and 2005.
Overall , from these two charts we are able to compare the flows of all the resources used for the energy production in France as in this pie chart we are able to show the differences which has been taken place in the last decades from 1995 to 2005. As in this the amount of coal has been subsequently increased from 29.80% to 30.93% but in this chat we are able to see that there is a slight improvement in the amount of gas used as a energy consumption resource which is around 29.63% in 1995 to 30.31% in 2005.
But there are many resources such as the use of petrol in the energy consumption in France which has been lowered intensively at a very high rate from 1995 to 2005 . In these 10 years the percentes of petrol has been decreased from 29.27% to 19.55% which is around a difference of 10% . Also, nowadays energy resources such as nuclear energy in France has been used and is increasing from 6.40% to 10.10% in the last few decades.
I am happy to look at this pie chart of France in regards to the comparison of the energy consumption as they are improving at a very fast rates as we see “every coin has two faces” so in some fields of energy consumption in France it is improving a lot but in some areas it is requires a lot to improve such as in the consumption of coals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g two years of 1995 and 2005. Overall , from these two charts we are able to co...
^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly increased from 29.80% to 30.93% but in this chat we are able to see that the...
^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o see that there is a slight improvement in the amount of gas used as a energy co...
^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...provement in the amount of gas used as a energy consumption resource which is ar...
^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ly at a very high rate from 1995 to 2005 . In these 10 years the percentes of petr...
^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
....55% which is around a difference of 10% . Also, nowadays energy resources such as...
^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s nuclear energy in France has been used and is increasing from 6.40% to 10.10% i...
^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...ppy to look at this pie chart of France in regards to the comparison of the energy consumptio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion as they are improving at a very fast rates as we see “every coin has two face...
^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'rate'?
Suggestion: rate
...n as they are improving at a very fast rates as we see “every coin has two faces” so...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31460674157 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48601024004 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.415730337079 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.1052878583 43.030603864 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.571428571 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.1428571429 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300220217972 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175613413628 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154051445947 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244582231893 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15114554033 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.29 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.31 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.