The information about the distinct kinds of energy production such as coal, gas, petro, nuclear and other of France in 1995 and 2005 is depicted by the rendered pie chart. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
To begin with, coal, gas and petrol energy were relatively highest produced energy sources in both years. In 1995, coal energy was produced approximately 29.80% and relatively low as compared with 2005, which makes up 30.93% . Referring to gas energy, it was second highest produced in both years but in 2005 production was increased as compared to 1995 and the percentage of both ears was respectively 30.31% and 29.63% . Nonetheless, petro energy production was fall down in 2005, which was 19.55% as compared to 1995, it accounted for 29.27% .
Moving further, nuclear energy and other energy production were escalated in 2005 than 1995. In 1995, nuclear and other energy production percentage was 6.40 % and 4.90% correspondingly, which were almost lower than 2005, it comprised to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively.
Overall, it can be vividly manifested that all over energy production of France was increased in 2005 rather than 1995.
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The picture below shows Bell Hill farm in 1976 and changes that took place in 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil Write a report for university lecture describing the information below 56
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 92
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK resident in 1999 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The information about the distinct kinds...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a has been calibrated in percentage. To begin with, coal, gas and petrol ener...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ompared with 2005, which makes up 30.93% . Referring to gas energy, it was second ...
^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... ears was respectively 30.31% and 29.63% . Nonetheless, petro energy production wa...
^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ompared to 1995, it accounted for 29.27% . Moving further, nuclear energ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to 1995, it accounted for 29.27% . Moving further, nuclear energy and other...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively. Overall, it can be vividly manifested th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nonetheless, second, so, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23655913978 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78080081732 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543010752688 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4197153425 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178693485894 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899913561421 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692323811667 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135207508007 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537731102001 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.