The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The pie charts provide information about generation of energy in two years of France.
Overall it can be seen that production of energy increased each energy in 2005 except petro dcreased.
Looking at the France pie charts in more detail ,it is evident that the amount of energy which was generated from coal increased from 30.93 pre cent in 2005, which was the biggest change on the charts .production of energy from petro decreased ,around 19,55 % while in 1995 rised slightly about 29.27 %. In contrast, energy production from Gas and Coal stay approxmaitly 29 pre cent in 1995. The Nuclear and other climbed rapidly in 2005 10.10%and 9.10% while 1995 dropped Nuclear and other 6.40% and 4.90%.
Turning to the second set of pie charts ,showing data from France ,it can clearly be seen that the amount of enenrgy which was produced the Gas increased slowly in 2005 while 1995 decreased about 29,63%. enenrgy generation from nuclear decreased about 6.40 while in 2005 increased 10.10%. Similar to two years , the amount of energy which produced from gas increased from 1995 to 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | CHÚC | view | |
| 2023-07-02 | Risti | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view |
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 67
- Making sugar by sugar cane 89
- The charts show the percentage of enrolments on six courses at a local education college in the UK in 2010 and 2020 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... at the France pie charts in more detail ,it is evident that the amount of energy ...
^^
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ich was the biggest change on the charts .production of energy from petro decrease...
^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...roduction of energy from petro decreased ,around 19,55 % while in 1995 rised sligh...
^^
Line 4, column 378, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cent' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cents'.
Suggestion: cents
...m Gas and Coal stay approxmaitly 29 pre cent in 1995. The Nuclear and other climbed ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Turning to the second set of pie charts ,showing data from France ,it can clearly...
^^
Line 6, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of pie charts ,showing data from France ,it can clearly be seen that the amount o...
^^
Line 6, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Enenrgy
...2005 while 1995 decreased about 29,63%. enenrgy generation from nuclear decreased about...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...5 increased 10.10%. Similar to two years , the amount of energy which produced fro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98351648352 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3223498842 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5913547912 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20905329925 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116276307943 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888598408621 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172644413851 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729661115164 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.