The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
The comparison in the treatment of harmful waste in three different countries by using various methods is displayed in pie charts, shown in percentage.
Overall, the UK has the most variant of ways to manage the waste. However, the most popular method to treat the waste in European countries is to burry it underground, while Republic of Korea is more likely to recycle it.
As per data, Great Britain and Sweden process the waste products mostly by burring those underground, with the rate at more than four fifths and around a half, respectively. Meanwhile, ingeneration is less well-known implementation in both nations, being the minimum data recorded. While Sweden prefers recycling a quarter of goods, the UK more dependently chooses to dump at sea and to use chemical substance less than one in ten of those, running.
When it comes to the only Asian nation, Korea implements ecofriendly management, being the highest figure for recycling this dangerous items over three fifths of the disposed products. Furthermore, there are approximately a fifth of those burried under the soils. Turning to the burning treatment, it is also the most unpopular way in this state, and merely below a tenth is destroyed by burning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-04-10 | minhnhat2002 | 87 | view |
| 2024-03-13 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | mystiquesugane | view |
- The proportion of adult who owned digital devices in the USA from 2004 to 2015 63
- The graph below shows the top priorities by business companies in the USA in 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart compares the recycling rates of four different kinds of waste material in a city from 1992 to 2002 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this underground' or 'those undergrounds'?
Suggestion: this underground; those undergrounds
...ss the waste products mostly by burring those underground, with the rate at more than four fifths...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'fifths'?
Suggestion: fifths
... Furthermore, there are approximately a fifth of those burried under the soils. Turni...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13432835821 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85458572943 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641791044776 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.091561872 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148769959351 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515558174634 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577938065728 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910485897172 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499588096624 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.