The given pie graphs demonstrate what is the proportion of using demolish processes for treat hazardous waste products in 3 countries which are republic of korea, Sweden and United Kingdom.
According to pie charts, undergranding is responsible fort he most significant contribution ın sweeden and united kingdom, 55 % and 82 % respectevily, moreover this process is just 22% in Korea. Processing of Recycling is chosen for dealt with their wastes by Korea with 69%. Way of Incineration have the lowest proportion of destroying process throughout 3 graphs which are 9, 20 and 2 respectivly.
Overall all countries choose different process of destroying to waste products. Republic of Korea and Sweden are using just 3 processes which are recyling, underground and incineration. On the other hand, in United kingdom choose extra two methops instead of recycling while the method of chemical tratments and dumping at sea share similar proportion and together are host to roughly one-five of total share.
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- University education should be free to everyone regardless of income To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 73
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Korea with 69%. Way of Incineration have the lowest proportion of destroying proc...
^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gdom choose extra two methops instead of recycling while the method of chemical ...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... two methops instead of recycling while the method of chemical tratments and dum...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42675159236 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.031394347 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3065667578 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0727867037872 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397084946245 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486776264915 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566290425736 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029311117369 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.