The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK University in 1987 and 2007.
The pie charts illustrate the factors that affected students' decision to study at a particular British university, between 1987 and 2007
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that having suitable degree courses was the most important issue in both years. Reasons like: the distance from their parent's home to school became more popular, the opposite was true with the remaining causes.
In 1987, the proportion of the student decided to choose a university for having suitable degree courses was the most at 35%, following by the number of students who preferred to choose a college that was near to their parent's house was the least only reaching 10%. Over the two decades ensuing, the rate of the student wanted having fitting level courses increased slightly to 37%, while the figure for close to parental doubled to 22% into 2007.
Relating to the other point, Quality of resource which was the second most common reason in the first year, however, dropped mildly by 4% to 17%. Similarly, Quality of teaching also fell a half from 15% to 8%, It seems the number of the student who liking attended the sports and communal activities less and less, therefore the figure went down by 13%, only arriving at 6% in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | thenaolayeu122 | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the proportion of people’s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008. 89
- The use of social media such as Facebook Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Writing reading and maths are the three recognized traditional subjects Computer skills should also be the fourth largest branch Do you agree or disagree 78
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 73
- The graphs represent the number of students in the UK who was financed by the administration from 1991 to 2001 and think about the extent of understudies from various family financial stages in 1991. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, second, similarly, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88571428571 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35616141184 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.885992951 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.0 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207234725625 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928545377487 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770679781705 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147493828706 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120001028274 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.