The pie charts indicate the water consumption in different sections including industrial, agricultural, and domestic by percentage in six different parts of the world.
While the majority of water consumed in South America, Africa, Central Asia, and South East Asia in the agricultural section, in Europe and North America great amount of water consumption associated with industrial area.
As can be seen from the pie charts, while Central Asia, Africa and South East Asia used more than 80% of their water resources in farming, these percents were lower than 10% for domestic usage
(7%,9%,7% respectively). The percent of consumption of water in industrial area was also very low about 5% for Central Asia, 7% for Africa and 12% for South East Asia. In South America, although agriculture is a main user of water with 71%, domestic usage by 19% is higher than industry by 10% in this region.
In more industrialized countries in North America and Europe, the majority of their consumption is attributed to industry (48% and 53% respectively). The percentage of water consumption in other areas with an insignificant different are like each other, 39% and 32% for agriculture and 13% and 15% for domestic user respectively.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization.Why might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 89
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s were lower than 10% for domestic usage 7%, 9%, 7% respectively. The percent of ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11940298507 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91933413967 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.7483729295 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17955719507 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099834815246 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757137229551 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121585653602 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687644292031 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.