The given pie charts depict the Oscar's victors of 7 different kinds of movie in 5-year period, starting from 2003.
Overall, thrilling movie contributes for a largest sector of the pie charts in both years, compared to the smallest figure of that in humourous one. It is also clear that after 5 years, more action, science fiction as well as documentary, received more Oscar's medal than they used to claim.
Looking at the circle-shaped graphs, in 2003, thriller and horror movies makes up over a half of the chart, however, that number decreased significantly in the next 5 years. In contrast, just a small fraction of science fiction won Oscar awards in 2003, the data of that mildy increased in 2008, making it higher than romanitic movies.
Regarding to the same charts, it is noticeable that throughout a half of a decade, the position of comedy genre remained unchanged in an Oscar's ranking table, but the number was insignificant. Opposite to the decline in romane's medals, action films climbed up and compensating one-fourth in the second chart, totally.
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 89
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 73
- Many people aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the causes of this How to overcome this problem 84
- Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects other people think in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both the views and give your opinion 73
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...verall, thrilling movie contributes for a largest sector of the pie charts in bot...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, well, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02247191011 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72074887394 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651685393258 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2691632676 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239947189274 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970626413364 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447962167884 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133234814489 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304517817567 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.