The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The pie charts provide information the amount of electricity production by five different fuel sources in Australia and France in the year of 1980 and 2000.
Overall, Australia used four types of fuel source for electricity production while France used all types of fuel source. No Nuclear power source was used in Australia.
According to the pie charts, in 1980, total 100 units electricity production in Australia where half units was the coal source. Natural gas and hydro power was the same amount used which were 20 units. Only 10 unit oil was used for electricity production. On the other hand, in 2000, coal the largest unit fuel source used in Australia was 130 units and 36 unit Hydro power used for electricity production. However, Natural gas and oil were the lowest amount used only 4 unit total.
In Contrast, in 1980, France used 25 units coil for electricity production which was the same as natural gas. Oil was used 20 units which was 5 units higher than nuclear gas. Hydro power used only 5 unit from total 90 unit production. In 2000, France used highest units nuclear power for electricity production which was more than 7 time higher compare to the 1980. Coal and oil were the same units used which were 25 units as well as Natural gas and hydro power also the same which were 2 units only.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 56 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 67
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 61
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also the same which were 2 units only.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70562770563 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37683232666 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.385281385281 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.648483157 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6153846154 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35935196713 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180593323564 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139563630673 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315394668307 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129531824197 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.46 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.