The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate the manufacturing of electricity units from the fuel sources such as(coal, oil, Natural gas, hydro power, nuclear power) in Australia and French in the year of 1980 and 2000. The production of the electricity are measured in units.
Overall, In Australia, coal is the most significant source for producing electricity in both these years. In comparison, At the beginning of the period, major source of electricity generation in French were coal and natural gas whereas, the nuclear power made up a large part of electricity production in French at the end of the period.
In terms of the unit production, coal is the most popular source of fuel used by the Australia in 1980 and 2000 accounted for (50 units and 130 units) respectively. In 1980, Hydro power contributed a fifth to the total production in Australia which then grow slightly to 36 units by the year of 2000. Whereas, the fuel sources like oil and natural gas which comprised 10 units and 20 units of the chart in 1980,decreased dramatically to the same level (2 units) in 2000.
In French, nuclear power was generated 15 units initially and then rose abruptly to 126 units in the final year. While, figure for the oil increased slightly from 20 units to 25 units over the period of 20 years. In contrast, units manufactured by the coal remains unchanged in both years to about 25 units.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...rce of electricity generation in French were coal and natural gas whereas, the nucle...
^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...or 50 units and 130 units respectively. In 1980, Hydro power contributed a fifth t...
^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he final year. While, figure for the oil increased slightly from 20 units to 25 u...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77320155181 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474789915966 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5014851267 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.9 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275102181657 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126462379258 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678094327161 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185968725644 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867479393351 0.0819641961636 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.