The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the units of electricity produced by various fuel sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000, respectively.
Overall speaking, the total production of electricity in Australia was 10 units higher than that in France, while it was exceeded by France for 10 units in 2000. France had achieved nuclear electricity production technology since 1980 and the units of electricity produced by nuclear power recorded significant growth from 1980 to 2000, while this type of fuel source has never appeared in Australia.
The main fuel source for electricity production in Australia was coal in 1980, which accounted for about half of the total production, and it saw an increase to three quarters in 2000. Another increased use of fuel sources was hydropower, which produced 20 units in 1980 and increased to 36 units in 2000. However, the electricity produced by natural gas and oil saw a marked decrease from 1980 to 2000, which were 18 units and 8 units decreased respectively.
In France, natural gas and coal played the most significant role in electricity production in 1980, like Australia, the use of natural gas saw a dramatic fall too (from 25 units to 2 units). The electricity produced by hydropower was the lowest both in 1980 and 2000. The production of coal remained virtually unchanged, while the use of oil for electricity production recorded a slight increase from 20 units in 1980 to 25 units in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | Blackcytrus | 74 | view |
- Some people who have been successful in society don t attribute their success to the theoretical knowledge they learned from their university Do you agree the theoretical knowledge is not as valuable as expected 84
- The table shows the amount of waste produced by different countries in 1980 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- It is better for students to live away from home while studying at university than living with parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- A longer prison term as a way of punishing those who break the law is not as good as other methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01244813278 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85070998313 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.414937759336 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2103668403 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.222222222 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3467623315 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191877684563 0.103423049105 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826929889551 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278894003207 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725226020531 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.