The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts below illustrate different sources of electricity in Australia and France in two years, 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the production of electricity in both nations saw some increases, with Australia producing an extra 70 units, while that figure for France exactly doubled.
First, in 1980, coal was the main source to create electricity in Australia, taking up half of the whole production. Followed by that was hydro power and natural gas both of which accounted for 20 units. Oil was least used in this nation, however, as only one tenth of electricity production derived from this fuel source. Looking into France, coal, natural gas and oil were the three major sources respectively in the production while nuclear power, which didn't exist in Australia at that time, became the fuel for 15 percent of electricity.
Turning to 2000, coal was the largest fuel source as they accounted for 130 out of 170 units. Another type of fuel used was hydro power, and natural gas and oil only took up a very small percentage in the total electricity production. Meanwhile, in France, nuclear power already rose to become the major source. 25 units of electricity were produced from coal and oil and natural gas, along with hydro power, made up a little percentage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | Blackcytrus | 74 | view |
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both view 89
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e production while nuclear power, which didnt exist in Australia at that time, became...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58745226436 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7517295221 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205914701396 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953288592866 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899407581663 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164921046779 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957768431167 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.