The pie charts below shows average household expenditure on 6 different items in a country in year 1950 and 2010.
Summarise the information and make a report by selecting main features and make comparisons where necessary.
The two Pie Charts illustrate, information regarding average expenditure of a house on 6 different categories in a country in years 1950 and 2010.
Overall, housing which comprise three fifth (75%) of total budget in 1950 decreased to only one fifth (25%) in 2010. In 2010 food expenses made most of the budget.on the other hand healthcare remained the least priority.
To begin with, in 1950 housing contributed 72% of average household expenditure, and education about 6.6%. Both of them decreased overtime with housing showed significant decline of 50% in 2010 most amongst all, while education with a minor decrease of 0.3 percent.
Furthermore, in 1950 citizens spending on food, transportation and other were 11%, 4% and 3% respectively.These figures rose to 34% for food which was most by any category about 20%. Whereas, transportation and other figures went up 15% and 11% respectively.Health expenditure inclined by 2% during this time .
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey with sample the cross section of 100 000 people asking if they travelled abroad and why they travel for the period 1994 to 1998 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period Write a repo 63
- These days many children have difficulty concentrating and paying attention in schools What are the causes for it How can it be dealt with 68
- The table below shows the figures of imprisonment in 5 countries between 1930 and 1980 Write a report for a University lecturer describing the information shown below 76
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.Write a report for university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
... other were 11%, 4% and 3% respectively.These figures rose to 34% for food which was ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Health
...igures went up 15% and 11% respectively.Health expenditure inclined by 2% during this ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...enditure inclined by 2% during this time .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, regarding, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30463576159 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26208996744 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682119205298 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5154872902 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168761380936 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876212027076 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108995050524 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127965131219 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128268327275 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.