The pie charts below shows the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001.
The supplied pie charts delineates the percentage of a school's budget spent on insurance, teacher's salaries, furniture and equipment, resources, and other worker's salaries in three different years in the UK.
A glance at the three charts reveals that highest part was spent on salaries of teachers whereas least amount was contributed to insurance. In addition, while spending on paying other workers have reduced from 1981 to 2001, for furniture and equipment it was uplifted.
Now turning to details, in 1981, amount dedicated to pay salaries to teachers as well as other workers was slightly less than three-fourth of the total spending. Resources such as books and furniture and equipment were both given 15% each. Finally, remaining 2% was spent on insurance.
During the year 1991 and 2001, half of the total school expenditure was on tutors' wages while approximately one quarter was on other employees' wages and insurance combined. On the other hand, the percentage of budget on furniture and equipment was merely 5% in 1991 which rose to 23% in 2001. Conversely, resources were given 20% in 1991 before reducing to only 9% in 2001.
- The only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of international students enrolled in British universities in two years 1990 and 2014 75
- The table below shows information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 67
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 87
- The diagram below shows how coal is used to produce electricity 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ately one quarter was on other employees wages and insurance combined. On the oth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, if, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14438502674 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73206038823 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561497326203 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6395155109 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8888888889 5.23603664747 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167708049684 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665122892079 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632835699414 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107495606223 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550321678064 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.