The pie charts depicting the prevalence of a range of methods by which people can keep themselves well-informed in Canada and Australia.
Overall, Australia depends on fewer modes of new-accessing than Canada. Moreover, the main ways of staying up-to-date in those aforementioned countries are by going online and watching TV.
As per the chart, a prominent number of Australians keep themselves away from living under the rock by reading articles on the Internet, and this crosses the halfway mark with 52%. In this country, reading online news is also 15% more pervasive than getting hold of information through TV. Furthermore, Australia also witnessed the same proportion of people listening to the radio and those who get day-to-day information through unspecified sources with just under 5%.
The notion is slightly different for Canada as the number of individuals obtaining news from TV almost equalizes those who get them from online sources with each category accounting for 40% and 36%, respectively. In addition, the share of people reading prints doubles that of Australia with merely 15%. Last but not least, although listening to the radio in Canada is more widely known than that in Australia, this share only takes up approximately one-tenth of the overall proportion within the nation.
- Many parents today organize extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school 73
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree courses The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35265700483 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88271843563 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9214892903 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.111111111 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168486196855 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743110457219 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480513864108 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119186138987 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460063352623 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35265700483 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88271843563 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9214892903 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.111111111 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168486196855 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743110457219 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480513864108 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119186138987 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460063352623 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.