Some people argue that space exploration has had more to do with national pride than international effort.
To what extent do you agree with this?
How do you think space exploration will change in the future?
In recent times, courtesy of the cutting-edge technological advancements and the exponential ubiquity of astrology, it is undeniable that space discoveries have become more prevalent. It is being indicated that exploring outer space is inextricably interwoven with national pride rather than the cooperation between nations. However, I am in favor of the viewpoint that this type of effort is more about international effort and could cultivate the global development of space exploration in the future. In this essay, the reason for this phenomenon will be elucidated before drawing any further conclusion.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that space exploration could be greatly beneficial to the pride of home countries. To specify, after successfully coming back from space, not only will the astronauts be praised for their bravery but the image of their home country may also be cultivated in the eyes of society. Additionally, space exploration may be a testament to the success of many companies’ investments, as a result of which, more innovations might be funded for further development. For example, Jeff Bezos recently came back to Earth after his trip to space, which has significantly benefitted his reputation and the prestige of America as a whole.
On the other hand, when looking from a broader perspective, discovering the world outside of planet Earth indeed has more to do with international effort. First of all, more breakthroughs in the field of astrology can probably be taken place by virtue of nations’ cooperation. A prominent example of this is the International Space Station (ISS), which can be seen as a symbol for the effort of many developed countries, namely the United States, France, or Russia. Furthermore, if the perseverance in exploring the universe were to happen on a global scale, we could prospectively find a panacea for the overpopulation problems or employment shortage issues. This is not impossible as much scientific research has proven the possibility of life on Mars. Therefore, humanity may have already embarked on the journey to a new era where technology will be fully utilized for a myriad of space discoveries. There might be more state-of-the-art spacecraft that are capable of reaching the untouched lands of the universe or more humanoid astronauts that can help scientists with reports like weather patterns on Pluto or Venus.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the prospective reputation gained from space-travel success, what is more, the relationship between countries can be bolstered and the international effort can be increased for greater achievement in this sphere. All things considered, it is anticipated that space exploration will change for the better in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-24 | hannahbui | 72 | view |
| 2019-02-23 | riscaalfina | 80 | view |
| 2014-01-28 | Fardhani Dwi Aristya Putri | 90 | view |
- Some people think that outdoor activities bring beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- What are the advantages and disadvantages for children of watching television Discuss both sides 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 73
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 84
- Some people think that getting old is a negative thing whereas others think it is much easier for people to live in modern society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the better in the foreseeable future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40740740741 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25364823726 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553240740741 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.5346620009 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.411764706 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4117647059 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265440600812 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919285071822 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571381685296 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180200649762 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515222321808 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.