The Bar graph below shows the Expenditure in Million Pounds on fast food items by income groups in the UK.
You should write at least 150 words.
The bar graph depicts how people with a range of income in the UK spent money on fast food, specifically hamburger, fish & chips and pizza during 1990.
Overall, the most stratospheric amount of money was spent on hamburgers in both the high- and average-income group in 1990, with 47 million pounds and 33 million pounds respectively, whereas in the low-income group, the most-consumed type of fast-food item was fish & chips. The expenditure that the average and low-income people spent on pizza was the least, yet this was the second-most eaten by prosperous people.
According to the given charts, people with high income ate hamburgers significantly more than other types of fast food in 1990. In other words, fish & chips and pizza consumption of the year halved that of the aforementioned fast-food item. To be more specific, the expenditure spent on the former was about 2 million more than the latter. In the average-income group, however, the difference in terms of expenditure spent on fish & chips and pizza was more exponential when comparing to the aforementioned group with somewhere in the vicinity of 23 million.
Fast-food-wise, people with low income spent most of their money on fish & chips (17 million pounds), which equaled that of high-income people. Unlike other groups of people, it was hamburgers that this group of people spent the least of their expenditure money on. The trend is the same for pizza consumption, which was the least-bought type of fast food seen in this group - just merely 7 million pounds.
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 78
- The diagram shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
- WRITING TASK 2 Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s group - just merely 7 million pounds.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, whereas, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09126984127 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96891381684 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484126984127 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7228745242 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.3 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267026754101 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128618774385 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445787307142 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188762381696 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165906943147 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s group - just merely 7 million pounds.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, whereas, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09126984127 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96891381684 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484126984127 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7228745242 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.3 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267026754101 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128618774385 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445787307142 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188762381696 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165906943147 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.