Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In recent times, the act of developed countries donating money for cash-strapped countries has increased in terms of frequency, but it is indicated that this does not create any significant changes for the poverty of the latter. Thus, it is suggested that other means of support should be given to those developing countries. This essay partly agrees with the proposal that developed countries donating other forms of help, instead of financial support, and reasons will be given.
On the one hand, it is apparent to state that developed countries can send some experts to poorer countries temporarily to help with the economy. One prominent justification for this is that it can benefit those countries in the long term. Those people who expertise in their field of finances can help people in those cash-trapped countries gain more knowledge. This can directly create a substantial and significant impact on education, which can act as a precursor to forming a stronger and more knowledgeable labor force. With the intelligence of those trained employers and employees, it is strongly believed that the life quality of citizens will get better. On this account, the act of sending human support instead of financial aid can be more beneficial for those developing countries.
On the other hand, it is also undeniable that money support remains a prevalent kind of support from prosperous nations as the poorer ones are likely to need those financial aids to develop and expand their financial-developing projects. A good case in point is that if a nation has enough experts and plans to cultivate its financial state but lacks the needed amount of money to embark on those actions, it seems that the project will not likely be carried out.
To recapitulate, although it is true that financial aids are of significant importance to developing countries, other forms of help are highly encouraged to be given. Therefore, I somewhat agree that human support is more recommendable to be given to poorer nations, instead of financial helps.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | viet@2002 | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | quan12341234 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | cinderel | 61 | view |
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think that getting old is a negative thing whereas others think it is much easier for people to live in modern society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past Why Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 73
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 84
- The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, kind of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15915915916 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93620298253 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8955593371 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.153846154 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238858741606 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995017755381 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073690970496 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15457392243 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718337485287 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.