The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The comparison in the ways to access news in Canada and Australia is displayed in two pie charts, shown in percentage.
Overall, the two popular ways to receive news in both countries are by TV and online. However, the unidentified category shows the lowest proportion.
As per data, the highest rate of accessing news is on Internet-based one at in Australia over a half, compared to Canada witnessing this almost two-fifths. Meanwhile, TV news stands as the leader among the Canadian at two in five, being higher that it amid Australian with a gap of 3%.
When it comes to the radio, its proportion accounts for closely a tenth in the aforementioned America Continent nation, being higher than that in the Australia one at below one in twenty. Additionally, the printed information percentage in the later region is twofold, at 14%, than it in the counterpart. Eventually, unspecified group is below a twentieth, being the most minor level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-08 | tr_h.20 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | RIYA MODI | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | baotrammm | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | kien150199 | view | |
| 2023-07-15 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district 78
- Employers should focus on personal qualities instead of qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job To what extent do you agree 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer You should give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience 78
- The pie charts below show the data regarding the time people spend on smartphones and tablets divided by category 89
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03939840057 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5227205685 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188505414592 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080760233806 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101281275905 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135144320205 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110470298016 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.