The pie charts show user’s preference on social media channel throughout 3 years period, from 2011 until 2013. Social media channels accounted on the charts are Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, and Pinterest.
The presented pie charts reveal people's interest in five different social networking sites between 2011 and 2013.
Overall, apart from the percentage of people considering Facebook as their favorite social media channel, the other figures all underwent an upward trend. In addtion, Facebook was recorded to be the most popular choice over 3 years.
In 2011, at a staggering 59%, the percentage of people voting for Facebook was the highest figure in the chart. Then, 2 years later, this figure gradually decreased by 21%. Conversely, with 21% of voters in the beginning of the period, the figure for Twitter witnessed a slight increase to a quarter in 2013.
Considering the other categories, in 2011, the proportion of people opting for Linkedln was 10%, which was twice as much as the figure for Google+ and Pinterest as well. Over the next 2 years, while Linkedln and Pinterest just experienced a very slight rise to 15% and 8% respectively, the percentage of users considering Google+ as their favorite social media site tripled, with 14% in 2013.
- The pie charts show user s preference on social media channel throughout 3 years period from 2011 until 2013 Social media channels accounted on the charts are Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google and Pinterest 89
- The table shows the percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features 47
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 87
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 84
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, so, then, well, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09770114943 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69829269332 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591954022989 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6632240506 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272555566284 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107433865155 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655005127949 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159817965299 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293231989841 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.