The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participant.
Toggle navigation
×Status message
Essay The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participant has been updated.
Primary tabs
View(active tab)
Edit
Delete
Essay topics:
The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participant.
The two pie charts depict the different activities changes according to gender. In the former one, the data for boys are portrayed whereas in the second one the data for girls.
Overall, it can be manifested that boys spend the maximum time in sports games, in which the highest percentage is spent playing computer games. However, the majority of girls are interested in indoor activities and they prefer dancing more.
Firstly, the majority of boys play computer games with just over one third. While the girls noticed almost half of it(16℅). Listening to music have an equal proportion for boys and girls which is one-tenth. Interestingly, boys have the least interest in reading, which is 2 ℅, whereas the girl noticed ten times more than boys.
Secondly, girls are doing gymnastics and netball which are 11℅ and 15℅ respectively. Whereas, the second-highest game played by boys at just over a quarter is basketball. Moreover, 17℅ boys played soccer, but 6 ℅ less than that noticed in skateboarding
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participant 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car and a fridge Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages 61
- An increasing number of people are now using dating websites to meet their second halves Do you think this tendency help person or does more harm than good 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 16, column 77, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...omputer games with just over one third. While the girls noticed almost half of it16℅....
^^^^^
Line 18, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...all which are 11℅ and 15℅ respectively. Whereas, the second-highest game played by boys...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27519379845 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67611731244 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.9177709776 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2142857143 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.616089799732 0.215688989381 286% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185008919204 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.272498197715 0.0843802449381 323% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.37115103509 0.15604864568 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.390815847621 0.0819641961636 477% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.