The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph depicts grams per person per week of fish and various kinds of meat in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it can be manifested that the consumption of beef, lamb and fish had declined over the years. while the highest consumption of chicken noticed in the last year.
To begin with, in 1979 the equal consumption of chicken and lamb was 150 grams per person per week. After that, both the categories had the opposite trend, where the former one gradually grew and reached a peak in 2004 with 250 grams per person per week. whereas the latter one declined and seen around 60 grams per person per week in 2004.
On the other hand, the highest consumption of beef was just above 200 grams per person per week in the initial year. Then, till 1989 the consumption of beef increased at 240 grams per person per week. However, it was also fell in the following year's and was 100 grams in 2004. Moreover, the least consumption of fish accounted for around 50grams per person per week throughout the years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 67
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participant 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car and a fridge Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...b and fish had declined over the years. while the highest consumption of chicken noti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...b and fish had declined over the years. while the highest consumption of chicken noti...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...004 with 250 grams per person per week. whereas the latter one declined and seen around...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...989 the consumption of beef increased at 240 grams per person per week. However, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59459459459 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24461696785 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508108108108 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5934950749 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.0 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1459737422 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078705063509 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855685985001 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138014940869 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111441854951 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.49 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.