In this compulsory world, there still exists a tendency of people living with their parents after marriage. While such phenomenon has possessed several merits, in my perspective, it is more likely to be problematic for each family relationship.
It can not be denied that living with parents benefits the new married couple in several ways. First of all, given that the couple are still young and need much effort to either consolidate their position at work or strictly follow their career path while their parents could have much spare time, the latter seem to be always obliging to help the former with almost all the housework, leaving more time for them to concentrate on their jobs. Moreover, that those parents usually have more experiences in raising children would also become a valuable support for the young couple in nurturing their kids. On the other hand, living together with parents is probably be a wise choice for the young couple to save money as they need to deal with neither the cost of accommodation nor other living expense.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned advantages, the demerits of this trend are supposed to overshadow. Most notable of all is the increase of dependence attitude of the young mature, which lead to a vulnerable ability to fend for themselves. This problem probably stems from the fact that hardly any children living with parents have to deal with serious living issues such as financial status/ management as they can resort to their parents’ help whenever they need. Furthermore, the elders usually have a tendency to control the younger’s life, as a habit, hence making it a sheltered but cramped and stressful life. Finally, owing to the generation gap and the appearance of a new member, family members are more likely to share distinct school of thoughts, which could easily lead to conflicts, which seem to be too hard to deal successfully while maintaining the harmonious relationship.
In conclusion, although living with parents after marriage brings several dominant benefits to the young adults, it is also causing manifold insurmountable problems, which could break up the family affection.
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- Look at the maps below showing how the town of Harborne changes from 1936 to 2007 and summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features Make comparison where relevant 94
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 95
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 666, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...iving together with parents is probably be a wise choice for the young couple to s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 965.302439024 189% => OK
No of words: 350.0 196.424390244 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79849668098 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 106.607317073 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 283.868780488 196% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8862793825 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0207697849643 0.215688989381 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00990384423453 0.103423049105 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0159505114595 0.0843802449381 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0172276276767 0.15604864568 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104033718094 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 40.7170731707 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.