The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
The two pictures illustrate a park when it opened in 1920 and today. Overall, every feature of the park has been changed except for the entrances and one of the three rose gardens.
Looking first at the far left side of the image, the seats and music stage have been converted into a large amphitheatre with stadium-like seating. In the centre of the park, the two entrances remain the same, but the water fountain has been transformed into a rectangular-shaped rose garden with seating around each side.
Turning to the far-right side of the plans, the pond has become a play area for children and the glasshouse is now a water feature. Below the water feature, an underground parking area has been built and this can be accessed by turning left off Eldon Street. Next to the entrance on Arnold Avenue, the rose garden has been replaced with a café.
- The graph below given information from the 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with a projection until 2030. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australia men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The government should spend money on railway rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement. 78
- he chart below shows the level of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74666666667 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59401019445 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.255964633 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196298832047 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104593323517 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130637116493 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147405765606 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103263379029 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.