The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrate the structure of the public park during the year 1920 and as of today. We will discuss the changes or advancements made through the period of the decade. It is seen that all the rose gardens and seats which were around the Grange Park have now been brought into the center of the park. Also, it is noted that the children’s play area and cafe are constructed in the park.
Firstly, we will discuss the developments that have been made to the left side of the entrance. It is noted that no changes have been made to the entrance of the park. While, the fountain at the center is now replaced by a large rose garden compared to small gardens spread across, earlier in 1920. Additionally, the seating area is built across all four sides of the rose garden. One of the major changes today from 1920 is that huge Amphitheatre along with stage and a large number of seating’s erected for shows, which replaced the stage of musicians.
Secondly, the Café is introduced immediately towards the northeast of the garden for adults and children who come to visit the park. Furthermore, the pond for water plants is now demolished and a play area for children is built in its place. The water feature and underground car parking are also included in the garden.
Overall, many facilities have been included as of today for people to spend quality time in Grange Park.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- You travelled by plane last week and your suitcase was lost You have still heard nothing from the airline company Write to the airline and explain what happened Describe your suitcase and tell them what was in it Find out what they are going to do about i 80
- Human activity has had a negative effect on ecosystems animals and plants across the world Some people believe this cannot be changed while others feel that we can still take action to protect living things and the environment Discuss both sides and give 78
- You have recently started work in a new company Write a letter to an English speaking friend In your letter Explain why you changed jobs describe your new job tell him her your other news 73
- The table below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport Write a report for a university lecturer describing the infor 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... huge Amphitheatre along with stage and a large number of seating’s erected for shows, which repl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46774418962 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516260162602 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4588356305 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3076923077 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147475334713 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617057964337 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570442915742 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101753370227 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467193637557 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.