the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The plans demonstrate the layout of old public park, when it was opened in 1920 and how it was reconstructed with modern facilities in recent times.
Overall, some infrastructures have been replaced and modified, while some modern facilities have been added. Furthermore, both entrances are remained at same place.
According to the maps, the old fountain which was in the middle of the 1920 park has been replaced by rose garden surrounding with seating facilities. Similarly, stage for musicians was modified and now we can see modern Amphitheatre for concerts, at the same place, in the west side of park.
However, the rose garden which was next to the Arnold Avenue entrance was replaced by café for public. Similarly, old pond also has been replaced by children’s playing area and pond is shifted near to the Eldon street entrance with modern water feature and bigger size, by replacing glass house. Additionally, underground car park has been introduced in recent Grange park. Whereas, rose garden and seats which was in the ride corner of park have been removed in new public park.
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 56
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 84
- The graphs below show how people in a European city reached their office and got back home in 1959 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12154696133 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69223520498 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9066812686 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214420531653 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102649070637 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077147694017 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146269474426 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861043355573 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.