The maps below illustrate the changes of the Grange park in 1920 and today. Two rose gardens and entrances have remained but the others remain fully changed compared with first opened.
There were three rose gardens on left-top, right-top and left-bottom of the park in 1920 but the only left-top rose garden remains in the same place and the other two were replaced to a café and empty today. The entrances on the top and bottom of the middle have not replaced or changed until now. As well as five benches around the park in 1920 were removed but four are in the middle of the park.
Some places have been removed to replace to other facilities. The stage for musicians was in the middle of the left-handed rose gardens but the concert hall is now in the today’s map. The pond at top-right corner turned into playground for children as well as the glasshouse in 1920 have reconstructed to water feature. Finally, the fountain in the middle of the park was turned into squared shape rose garden and surrounded by the four seats.
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the ma 84
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98.The second chart shows their destinations over the same period. 61
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 11
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 62
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67391304348 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38127838933 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527173913043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3992421393 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146811059798 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738522727651 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718096795095 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112482190509 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236978699336 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.