The provided map elucidates the difference between a dorm room for two pupils and a dorm accommodation for one student at a university in Australia.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the major distinctions between the two rooms are the price, the size, and the furniture of each room.
As can be seen, the first room is the larger, more expensive one, with more amenities and the ability to accommodate a greater number of pupils. The first room, which can accommodate two people, costs $350 a week, whereas the second room, which can accommodate just one person, costs $200 per week. In comparison to the second room, which measures just 6m x 2.5m, the first chamber is much bigger, measuring 6m x 4m.
Two beds, two study tables, two televisions, two cabinets, a bookcase, and a table and chairs are located in the first room. The second room, by contrast, contains only one bed, one study desk, and one television, but no cabinets, bookshelves, or table and chairs. Windows, kitchen, and bathroom amenities are comparable in both rooms. The kitchen from the room for two students is located at the bottom left corner towards the east while the same one from the room for one pupil is also located at the same corner but towards the north.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 73
- Nowadays children spend more time playing computer games than doing sports Why is it happening Does it have a positive or negative effect on their development 42
- The map below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 64
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities Therefore some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q17 In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7963800905 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62191328432 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.73681727 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370045293178 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143214035611 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121558059024 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235296458341 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118878472753 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.