population
The line graph compares three types of nations namely Japan, France, and Yemen in terms of the percentage of inhabitants at the age of 65 and beyond from 1960 to 2040.
As is highlighted in the line graph, there was a noticeable change in the population of the three aforementioned countries. Japan witnessed an exponential increase in the population aged 65 and older, which was marginally more popular than France. In contrast, there was a reverse trend could be seen in Yemen over the 80-year period.
At the beginning of the period, the number of aged inhabitants were highest in France, about 11% which was double than one of Japan. Over the period of 40 years, France made up the most significant proportion of the elderly, seeing it climb to 13.30%, Japan experienced the very similar figure in 2000. In the foreseeable future, Japan is also forecasted to have a fair share of senior population and predicted to reach a peak at 30% in 2040. The figures for France are projected to be less considerable, a slight rise by 8.5% over 2 decades.
Have a glance at Yemen, to begin with, there was a slight fall in the proportion of the elders over the the year, accounted for 3.70% in 1960. Yemen lose their popularity in the percentage of early citizens and hit the bottom at 2.6% in 2000. In particular, this trend is anticipated to level off, merely 3.1% at the end of the period
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ll in the proportion of the elders over the the year, accounted for 3.70% in 1960. Yeme...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ll in the proportion of the elders over the the year, accounted for 3.70% in 1960. Yeme...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in contrast, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66260162602 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69319604023 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4171931339 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.272727273 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118119669292 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538310631832 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887661480829 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073199614683 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876058816244 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.