The process of Pu-erh Raw Tea and Ripe Tea Production.
The picture illustrates the process of Pu-erh Raw Tea and Ripe tea production.
Overall, Pu-Erh Ripe Tea production consists of five stages. Meanwhile, producing Vintage Pu-erh Raw Tea only requires four steps.
In the first stage, tea leaves are fried in a pan using a fire to eliminate enzymes. Then, the roasted tea leaves are rolled under the sun to create loose raw tea. Following that, the tea is molded to create a fermentation process, and this process produces loose Ripe Tea. After that, the tea undergoes the compression stage to produce the final product, Pu-erh ripe tea.
Moving to the production of Ripe Tea. The first two initial processes are similar to that of Pu-erh Ripe tea. Tea leaves are fried in a pan to deactivate the enzyme. In the second stage, the fried-tea leaves are rolled under the sun to produce loose raw tea. After that, Pu-erh raw tea is, then, compressed. Finally, it is stored to produce vintage Pu-erh Raw tea.
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food Other people believe that education will not work Discuss both opi 73
- Some people believe that children should obey rules and listen to their parents and teachers Some others believe that less control will help children deal with their adult life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other type of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 77
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85365853659 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42710502172 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451219512195 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.9247103578 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.2307692308 112.824112599 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.6153846154 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.69230769231 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.766028971265 0.215688989381 355% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.380984139053 0.103423049105 368% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150608794071 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.63054238005 0.15604864568 404% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711203136372 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.96 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.