The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assured until a musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Many a times society fails to understand the value of a talent of an artist, when they are alive. The artwork do not get recoginize and the artist dies will trying to make his or her name in the society. It is usually seen that the artwork value increases exponentially when an artist dies. Here the statement claims that the honest assessment of a musician can only be done when the musician dies. I agree with the statement and let me put fort few key factors to validate my stances.
With the help of technology it is very easy to fake a thing. With help of different software and tools available we can easily present things in our life which are totally fake. This fake life influnce principle is followed by many musician now days. They show that they music albumbs are getting millions of views online. They even show a fake life on the social media by which the younger generation is influnece. In the music albumbs more focus is kept on the money and fancy cars instead of the real music which is playing. The younger genereation gets influence by the life style of the musician and they became fans of that musician, even though the music is not very good. For instance, a musicians can hire a company which sells fake reviews and helps him in promoting the music by showing fake data with help of techonology. Here we cannot understand the real talent of the musicians.
Now a days there are many platforms for listing to music. So, a song which is catchy can get famous very easily across all this platform. The song can eaisly become the most trending song easily. From this we cannot say that the musician is talented, it could have happen that one of his song got famous due to good promotion and people listening to it. The song would not stay in trend once the people find some other song which is much better. The song could have been a trend as the musicians can make his song promote by different influencers.
I am not saying that the real talength of the musician is only assested when they die. Real talengt would always shine in the society, irrespective of gender, caste and religion. Here there many example of this in the history. In rapping industry, African-American had the monopoly for many years, but Eminem being an American earned a top position in the industry and proved every one wrong.
It is common trend in the society that the people do not vaulue the real talent of an individual when they are alive. This could be because there it is very easy to showcase a fake and a bogus lifestyle and fool people easily with help of technolgy. A real talent would only be known when a person dies as he or she can not control to what people are listing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-22 | shubham1102 | 61 | view |
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus 65
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten year budget for the city of Calatrava The birthrate in our city is declining in fact last year s birthrate was only one half that of five years ago Thus the number of students enroll 54
- The following memorandum is from the president of Primo Doll Manufacturing Inc According to a survey last year of parents who purchased the Elkie our most popular doll 90 percent reported that although their children were extremely satisfied with the doll 54
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assured until a musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
Many a times society fails to understand the value o...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'try'
Suggestion: try
...get recoginize and the artist dies will trying to make his or her name in the society....
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 694, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: a musician; musicians
...e music is not very good. For instance, a musicians can hire a company which sells fake rev...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...and the real talent of the musicians. Now a days there are many platforms for listing to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...the real talent of the musicians. Now a days there are many platforms for listing to...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...the musician is talented, it could have happen that one of his song got famous due to ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'many examples'.
Suggestion: many examples
... gender, caste and religion. Here there many example of this in the history. In rapping indu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd in the society that the people do not vaulue the real talent of an individual ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 7.0 343% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 1.00243902439 1596% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 3.15609756098 634% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 5.60731707317 731% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 965.302439024 228% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 490.0 196.424390244 249% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48775510204 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 3.73543355544 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3482950828 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 106.607317073 216% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469387755102 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 283.868780488 248% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 8.94146341463 302% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8003028171 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4444444444 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1481481481 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.925925925926 5.23603664747 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 3.70975609756 458% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187897918819 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522629423538 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462656542377 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101076055269 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179082302013 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 40.7170731707 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.