The well-being of a society is enchanced when many of its people question authority.
The role of the government is to serve people. The statemtent states that the society will enchanced when people will question authority. There are many reasons to determine that would a society advance or not. I do believe that questioning the authority would surely be beneficial. A few key factors to validate my point are:
First, any democratic country is made by the people, for the people, of the peolple. People are the final judges to judge the outcome of a particular government. The government should always do stuff which would be advantageous for people. For instance, government invest in schemes which will have immediate effects on the lifestyle of people, like by providing better healthcare, education, opportunities to start businesses and many more.
Futhermore, for any country to progress the people should have important role. People should have right to question the authorities, and raise quries. People should have freedom of speech and freedom to ask question and this is essential otherwise, the authorities would have to much power. For instance, in country like India, Right to Freedom to speech and Right to information are one of the most important laws of the consituition. This makes sures that the government could not do what ever they feel right.
If society is not allowed to question the authorities, it might happen that the authority may become corrupt and not work in favor of the people. Then the authorities would turn into dictators and only work for their benefit. No denying the fact, that people should have right to ask questions relating any topic. For instance, questions relating to armed forces and their covert operation shall not be discuss by the authorities and that is correct as, if these information fall into wrong hands then it would be a concern of nation safety.
In conclusion, society should have right to ask questions to the authority as this would keep a check on working of the government. Just beliving the government propaganda and not question it, would be harmful for society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-05 | titanite09 | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | priyanshu1 | 75 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | priyanshu1 | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
- The well being of a society is enchanced when many of its people question authority 50
- Claim Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed Reason It is inappropriate and perhaps even cruel to use public resources to fund the arts when people s basic needs are not b 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 58
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...l otherwise, the authorities would have to much power. For instance, in country li...
^^
Line 7, column 458, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
... authorities and that is correct as, if these information fall into wrong hands then it would be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t would be a concern of nation safety. In conclusion, society should have right...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, then, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08554572271 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73214313694 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480825958702 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5594071413 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7368421053 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8421052632 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78947368421 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295804814259 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969100741441 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078438818005 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185710690737 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975451621103 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.