The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Being a social animal, human beings live in groups or societies which helps them in various aspects. Ranging from small societies that constitute people living together and share resources, to a country which includes people from different backgrounds, professions and mentality. An overseeing authority is imperetive to lead or to guide a society, make sure that it does not succumb to internal disputes and to ensure the prosperity and burgeoning of its people. The prompt suggests that for the growth and well-being of a society, it is necessary that many of its members question the authority. In my opinion, I strongly agree to the presented statement because of the following two reasons.
Firstly, there are many instances when a leader's or a governing authority's actions or decisions are mostly driven by their own agendas. It is not unusual for people in power to show venality. If their decisions are more biased towards fulfiling their own agendas, rather than concerning the well-being of the society, it will not be surprsing it such society is headed towards an inevitable doom. For instance, let's consider the example of the Sri Lankan government where the entire country's government is controlled by a family. Moreover, the most influential positions, i.e. the President and the Prime minister are brothers from the same family. They took a series of decisions for self-serving purposes and controlled the whole structure of authorities as per their will, which lead to ultimate economical collapse of the country. Now the most interesting thing to observe is, that the population of the country did not start questioning the government until it was too late. If their leaders were put in check from the beginning and questioned their decisions, this kind of situation could have been prevented. Consider a scenario, if the people questioned this dictatorial hierarcy and demanded a democratic government. What if, the coutrymen raised their voice and questioned the policies, rules imposed on them and other 100 things, wouldn't the country's ultimate collapse would have been avoided?
Further, it also plays a crucial role whether a substantial number of society members are questioning the authorities or just a handful. This is highly relevant because voices of a few are easy to ignore or to be suppressed by those who are in power. On the other hand, it is much difficult for them to avert their attention when a mass is demanding answers for their deeds. Consider the example of Nokia, when android entered the market, almost all the mobile phone manufacturing companies abandoned their platform and adopted android because of its promising future. Nokia on the other hand, decided to stick with windows operating system. Recently, it has come to light that during the advent of android, a handful of employees at Nokia questioned the administration against their decision to not adopt android, but their voices weren't taken seriously. Consequently, the market of Nokia mobiles went downhill tremendously. The above example is a perfect evidence that illustrates why it is necessary for a majority of people to question the authorities.
Of course, some could argue that if people incessantly keep questioning the autorities, wouldn't it make their job more difficult? As they would spend lots of time in just responding to the questions, rather than doing their work. However, if the authorities are indeed doing their job properly, it shouldn't be a tiring task for them to answer the members and hence they wouldn't face much of a trouble from them. A collective good and prosperity comes when those in-charge are questioned and held accountable for their actions and decisions. And the best way to ensure this is by having the society's own members question the authorities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-05 | titanite09 | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | priyanshu1 | 75 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | priyanshu1 | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty 70
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 58
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 58
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 83
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a leader' or simply 'leaders'?
Suggestion: a leader; leaders
... Firstly, there are many instances when a leaders or a governing authoritys actions or de...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...s imposed on them and other 100 things, wouldnt the countrys ultimate collapse would ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 833, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... to not adopt android, but their voices werent taken seriously. Consequently, the mark...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...santly keep questioning the autorities, wouldnt it make their job more difficult? As th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
... questioning the autorities, wouldnt it make their job more difficult? As they would...
^^^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...are indeed doing their job properly, it shouldnt be a tiring task for them to answer the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...em to answer the members and hence they wouldnt face much of a trouble from them. A col...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to, for instance, kind of, of course, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3190.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 616.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17857142857 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98190197535 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8405714085 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516233766234 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 979.2 704.065955056 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9638342234 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290304694709 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725844699487 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628568359408 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193412385979 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614643679055 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 100.480337079 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.