Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
The foundation of any well-functioning and thriving society rests upon its legal framework. Laws are the bedrock that defines a nation's legal code, ensuring the maintenance of law and order and the impartial delivery of justice. The prompt in question suggests that laws should be adaptable to different circumstances, times, and places. However, I firmly disagree with this notion. Laws are inherently rigid for a reason, and I present two compelling reasons to support my viewpoint.
Firstly, it is crucial to understand that the essence of law lies in its universality. Regardless of a person's status, gender, financial situation, or social influence, the law treats all individuals equally. This impartiality is what ensures that everyone is held accountable under the same legal standards. If we were to modify laws to consider specific circumstances, times, or places, we would open the door to potential abuse and manipulation by offenders. To illustrate this, imagine a scenario where someone robs a bank and unintentionally injures a security guard in the process. Robbing a bank is a serious crime deserving of punishment. However, if we start modifying the law to accommodate the robber's claim that they needed the money for a sick family member, it would create a dangerous precedent. It would allow criminals to exploit these accommodations, making the legal system chaotic. Each offender could craft their own sob story or devise excuses related to circumstances, times, or places, all of which could potentially fall under the purview of this new "flexible law."
Moreover, making laws more flexible would lead to a proliferation of complex scenarios. Attempting to address every possible circumstance, time, or place in the law would render the legal system overly intricate and impractical. The current legal framework is already comprehensive, covering a wide range of scenarios. If we introduce amendments to account for various situations, it risks rendering the legal system ineffective in practice.
Certainly, some may argue that there are cases where an individual's actions may not be severely criminal, and they may have been inadvertently influenced by their circumstances, the timing, or the place. While I acknowledge this perspective, the process of discerning such nuances should be left to the prosecution and the trial, rather than altering the law itself. As previously mentioned, the strength of the law lies in its impartiality and consistency. If necessary, considerations of circumstances, times, and places should be addressed within the framework of the legal process, rather than fundamentally altering the laws themselves. Implementing flexible laws would likely lead to an increase in crime rates, as fewer individuals would be charged and found guilty due to the dilution of legal standards.
In conclusion, the idea of making laws more accommodating to various circumstances, times, and places should be met with skepticism. The fundamental purpose of the law is to provide a stable and consistent framework for justice, regardless of individual situations or external factors. Modifying laws to accommodate such variations would risk undermining the integrity and effectiveness of the legal system, potentially leading to a breakdown in law and order.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 58
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty 70
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 58
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 75
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...work. Laws are the bedrock that defines a nations legal code, ensuring the maintenance of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...es in its universality. Regardless of a persons status, gender, financial situation, or...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2810.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 509.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52062868369 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27615381668 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536345776031 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 873.0 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5294211326 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.36 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.96 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249046801357 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675301960925 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605613673344 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153004073677 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048633936689 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 100.480337079 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.