Fast food has been blamed as one of the top reasons that caused problems to human health. Fowever i do not agree with the idea to levy high tax on it to solve the problem.
First and foremost, there are still a big number of people living in poverty, who could now live on fast food which is comparatively cheaper than so-called healthy food. That is to say, while some people are pursuing a decent diet, others are struggling to survive. For example, there is about 10 percent of dwellers in big cities who do not get employed or are unable to work, and this type of people will need fast food to support their lives. In case a higher tax were put on these food, it would impose higher pressure on them.
Secondly, apart from fast food, there are many other elements leading to disease, such as genetic issues, insufficient sleep, lack of exercise, degrading environment, as well as government guidance and policies. A good example is a comparison between two countries. Vending machines with high calories drink like coca are available everywhere in USA, while more healthy drinks like green tea are easier to buy in Japan. as a result, the rate of obesity in the United States is about 10 times more than that in Japan.
In addition, high tax is never an effective solution. this can be illustrated by cigarrettes,which has been added with super high tax for decades but smoking is still showing an upward trend.
In conclusion, imposing high tax on fast food is not one of the good measures in terms of preventing health problems.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...aused problems to human health. Fowever i do not agree with the idea to levy high...
^
Line 2, column 479, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...lives. In case a higher tax were put on these food, it would impose higher pressure on the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...e green tea are easier to buy in Japan. as a result, the rate of obesity in the Un...
^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...igh tax is never an effective solution. this can be illustrated by cigarrettes,which...
^^^^
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
.... this can be illustrated by cigarrettes,which has been added with super high tax for ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65808823529 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53613323342 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 106.607317073 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4749388887 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4615384615 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 5.23603664747 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299886117633 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950502619484 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524810326235 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154020126719 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588878994315 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.