This is controversial among people whether they should cope with the difficulties, like job and money issues, or put effort to enhance the situation. From my point of view, while some situations are solid and impossible to change, others are improvable by endeavor.
On the one hand, some argue that acceptance is the best approach while facing hardship. There are various sides to this argument. The first and foremost is that our resources are not the same as that of other individuals. For instance, not everybody is born and grown up in an affluent family, taking advantage of appropriate education, affecting adulthood. Therefore, as every human experiences different life circumstances, the idea of expecting all to have outstanding performance and achievements is a misconception. So, we as human beings must accept ourselves as we are and be grateful for things that are not changeable.
On the other hand, hard work and improvement attract some proponents based on several causes. First of all, besides the parts of life we accept as solid, many factors are yet under our control. As an example, our attitude towards life is a factor hardly been influenced by anyone except us. Thus, by applying an optimistic perspective, we can make the most out of the difficult and seemingly unchangeable situations. Furthermore, change is the essence of this world, and if we were not supposed to make a change, we would not be brought to this life. Evidence of this notion is the developments provided by perseverant people in history, who contributed to make the world a better place, despite their personal difficulties.
In conclusion, from my standpoint, although some tough situations are solid and unlikely to become better, a considerable part of our success still depends on our efforts. However, acceptance is a vital skill to both deal with the unchangeable part and prepare our minds to make progress in the rest.
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decided to do this. 84
- The Bar Chart Below Shows The Numbers Of Men And Women Attending Various Evening Courses At An Adult Education Centre In The Year 2009 The Pie Chart Gives Information About The Ages Of These Course Participants 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 89
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.0 300% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 5.60731707317 482% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 965.302439024 163% => OK
No of words: 316.0 196.424390244 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98734177215 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88984181356 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 106.607317073 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 283.868780488 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 316.0 22.4926829268 1405% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1576.0 112.824112599 1397% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 316.0 22.9334400587 1378% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 142.0 5.23603664747 2712% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180192915581 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180192915581 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115852007277 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520885442652 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 160.1 13.2329268293 1210% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -249.26 61.2550243902 -407% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 126.5 10.3012195122 1228% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.14 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.11 8.06136585366 287% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 11.4329268293 507% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 128.4 10.9970731707 1168% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 127.0 11.0658536585 1148% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.