Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled.
They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is argued that a great deal of waste materials do not go under recycling procedure, and so the governments should pass some laws in order to force citizens to reverse their wrong habit of not distinguishing rubbish. Personally speaking, I believe it is an urgent issue which needs to be addressed promptly. Then any measures, such as law enforcement could be an effective solution to this ever increasing problem.
To begin with, people always react faster under pressure, so when residents find out they might face severe prosecution or high fine, overnight changes would be possible in societies. In my country, for example, fastening seat belts could not become a driving culture, unless heavy fines were imposed. Similarly, separating different waste in order to be feasible for recycling could become citizens' everyday practice after several years of law enforcement. Rubbish, such as plastic bags and packages which have altered our planet's face over the past few years could simply be recycled and not only solve the littering problem but reduce the growing pressure on earth resources. Since years of education and advertising campaign have not been able to overcome this issue, the only remaining remedy would be introducing strict laws.
In addition, tough reaction, rather than lenient one, to a wrong behavior would show how serious a situation has become. Unfortunately, many people still believe that the earth is considerably big enough to absorb all of the waste, and in contrast all information regarding waste issues are merely a bunch of exaggerated stories. However, according to scientists, materials which are not degradable in a short term, such as plastics, are occupying our space and influencing humans and animals as well as environment in everyday life. Therefore, legislation which are followed by imposing severe punishment would soon illustrate a thorough understanding of the alarming situation.
In conclusion, wastes are affecting our environment adversely and it needs a prompt measure. In this case recycling as an approach to prevent, or at least mitigate this problem should become a rule for both individuals and factories if the future of our planet matters.
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example, working for charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled.They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 78
- Using a computer everyday can have more negative than positive effects on young children.Do you agree or disagree? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...th is considerably big enough to absorb all of the waste, and in contrast all information ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, well, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 965.302439024 193% => OK
No of words: 350.0 196.424390244 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32857142857 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86705281373 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 106.607317073 212% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645714285714 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 283.868780488 206% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6325702434 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.214285714 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2857142857 5.23603664747 235% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165726610236 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512255107707 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476594756739 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096548076771 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352491305347 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 40.7170731707 268% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.