the survey result about the facilities, information, and quality of a new amphitheater in a town in 2012.
The tables illustrate the survey result about the facilities, information, and quality of a new amphitheater in a town in 2012.
Overall, the state-of-the-art recreational building satisfied playhouse supporters at a higher level than the community. There were more surveyed supporters rated excellent for the equipment than the populace. Moreover, the data and facilities of the new coliseum met the needs of approximately a similar number of supporters and society. In contrast, a tiny portion of the total survey respondents complained about the equipment and functions. It was the theater statistics that dissatisfied all survey participants the most.
Regarding the result from the club participants, although 88% of them were most pleased with the excellent features, only 10% of the people rate satisfied. Meanwhile, there was an eightfold difference in terms of poor ratings from the club members between the theater data and the figure for the furniture and quality.
On the contrary, the majority of the community agreed that the playhouse brought excellent statistics (66%) and facilities (64%). Additionally, the quality of the new coliseum satisfied the requirements of two-fifth of the populace, which was four times higher than the percentage of neutral responses from the club supporters.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56281407035 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18259102528 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2439468174 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270480694368 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107170460886 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161559621289 0.0843802449381 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208679218293 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.218135172747 0.0819641961636 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.