The table above compares the differences in the sales of coffee and banana whose Fairtrade labels had been attached in five countries in Europe in the two years of 1999 and 2004.
It is clear that over the five-year period, the UK is still ranked the highest with the most significant increase in volume in both values. However, on an overall scale, rises are seen over the years, except for Belgium and Sweden’s labelled bananas.
In 1999, Fairtrade-labelled coffee sales in Switzerland ranked the highest at 3 million Euro, followed by Denmark in 1.8, and the UK stood third at only 1.5. The next five-year saw a sudden jump in coffee sale of in the UK, which put this country right on top. Contemporarily, the Fairtrade-labelled coffee sale in Switzerland and Belgium almost doubled while the other 2 countries remained quite stable.
As for the sales of banana with Fairtrade labels, the UK stood at the top with 15 million Euro, seconded by Sweden and Belgium at 2 and 1.8 million respectively. Over the next five years, the UK continued to secure its top position with a rise up to 47 million Euro. Switzerland and Denmark also experienced sharp increases to 5.5 and 4 million Euro from just 1 and 0.6 respectively. Belgium and Sweden, however, showed signs of the drop to 1 and 0.9 million Euro respectively.
The table above compares the differences in the sales of coffee and banana whose Fairtrade labels had been attached in five countries in Europe in the two years of 1999 and 2004.
It is clear that over the five-year period, the UK is still ranked the highest with the most significant increase in volume in both values. However, on an overall scale, rises are seen over the years, except for Belgium and Sweden’s labelled bananas.
In 1999, Fairtrade-labelled coffee sales in Switzerland ranked the highest at 3 million Euro, followed by Denmark in 1.8, and the UK stood third at only 1.5. The next five-year saw a sudden jump in coffee sale of in the UK, which put this country right on top. Contemporarily, the Fairtrade-labelled coffee sale in Switzerland and Belgium almost doubled while the other 2 countries remained quite stable.
As for the sales of banana with Fairtrade labels, the UK stood at the top with 15 million Euro, seconded by Sweden and Belgium at 2 and 1.8 million respectively. Over the next five years, the UK continued to secure its top position with a rise up to 47 million Euro. Switzerland and Denmark also experienced sharp increases to 5.5 and 4 million Euro from just 1 and 0.6 respectively. Belgium and Sweden, however, showed signs of the drop to 1 and 0.9 million Euro respectively.
- The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work with the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who want and will go 73
- The table above compares the percentage of children with different educational problems in school A and school B in 2005 and 2015.It is clear from the table that the total percentage of students who were lack of educational abilities of school B was small 67
- The line chart above compares the amount of beef, pork, broilers and turkey, which the Americans consumed each year between 1995 and 2012.It is clear from the chart that both broilers and turkey flesh eating, increased significantly from 1960 to 2012 whil 78
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 56
- The line graph above demonstrates the quantity of waste released by three businesses A, B and C over fifteen years from 2000 to 2015.It’s easy to see that the three above bear little to no resemblance in the fluctuation of waste produced in tonnes.In th 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, still, third, while, as for, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9282614803 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55701754386 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9979423427 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429070018172 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186125083588 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224657167031 0.0843802449381 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33533304824 0.15604864568 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.255415835173 0.0819641961636 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.